Michlaude Discipleship Project

Part One: Received

Chapter Four — The School

Drawn from From Sons of God to Children of Light, Regenerate, Not Degenerate, Why the Church Stopped Teaching What You Are, Vol VII: The Sons of God

If the vine is how the life reaches you, the school is what the life does with you over time. The corpus uses the word theosis for it, and it spells out what it means and what it does not mean. It does not mean becoming God. The reader edition of the sons-of-God material says so in a sentence: "Not to become God — that was the serpent's lie in the garden, and it leads only to death." What it means is participation in the life of God by gift, and the corpus roots it in Peter's language:

"Through these he has given us his very great and precious promises, so that through them you may participate in the divine nature, having escaped the corruption in the world caused by evil desires."

— 2 Peter 1:4 (NET)

The image the corpus uses to hold the distinction is iron in a forge. "The iron does not become fire. It never stops being iron." The iron glows because the fire is in it, and the glow is real, and the iron is never the fire. A creature that carries God's goodness, mercy, patience, wisdom and love is carrying something that belongs to God and has been given. The corpus says what God can share and what He cannot. The things that belong to God alone remain His. The things that are His nature as love, He pours.

Pouring is the corpus's governing verb for how the love arrives. The Spirit does it, and Paul says so:

"because the love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who was given to us."

— Romans 5:5 (NET)

The reader edition draws the practical line right away: "The love of God is not a standard you are asked to meet. It is a substance you are given to carry." A disciple who treats the love of God as a standard he must meet will strive, and the striving will tell him either that he is succeeding, which feeds pride, or that he is failing, which feeds despair. A disciple who treats it as a substance he carries has a different problem. His problem is to stay where the pouring happens.

The corpus calls the whole process a school, and it is blunt about what a school involves. The reader edition says the hard seasons are part of the curriculum: "The hard lessons are not the school failing. They are the school working." The pruning in John 15 is love, not punishment, and the Gethsemane road is the road to the throne, not a detour from it. The volume on regeneration puts the same thing in terms of the daily walk. And the shortest picture of what the school's graduates do is also the most ordinary: "The kitchen is the training ground for the throne." The council's work in the large story the corpus tells, lifting the low and judging with mercy, gets done at household scale by people who forgive, sit in grief, tell the costly truth, and kneel with a towel.

Two words carry the structure of the school. The reader edition calls them sons and children of light, and it keeps them apart. Sonship is a gift at the door: immediate, secure, and not subject to how well you did last week. Being a child of light is a walk: taken day by day, ordinary, resumable. "Sons by gift, children by walking." The distinction is practical. A disciple who has failed has not lost his sonship, so he has no reason to go back and apply for it again. He has missed a step in the walk, and he takes the next one. And a disciple who has been walking well has not earned his sonship, so he has no right to feel promoted.

There is a reason the corpus keeps insisting the school cannot be run as a program. A volume on why the church stopped teaching this puts it as flatly as anything in the writings: "Theosis in particular cannot be transmitted by information. It can only be transmitted by formation." And right beside it: "A doctrine about abiding is not abiding. A sermon about the vine is not the vine." The seven diagnoses in that volume are all, in different forms, reasons why a congregation can hold the doctrine correctly and still not hand it on. They have to do with how catechesis collapsed, how imagination thinned, how sanctification turned into a self-improvement question, how institutions and markets reward comfort preaching. The volume's recovery is not a program either. It is a church willing to be a school again, and the volume predicts the outcome with some restraint: "It will not be a large church, necessarily. But it will be a bright one."

One more note on how this chapter reports the corpus. The sons-of-God material is the largest and most distinctive story in the writings, and it includes the claim that the redeemed will share in governing, in a role that older created beings forfeited. Part Two says what the corpus claims about that story and how confidently. This chapter takes only what every volume agrees on: the school is real, the Teacher moves in, and the calling is received and not climbed to. The last sentence of the larger volume's conclusion says it better than a summary can: "You are in it. You are one of the ones creation is waiting for."