Prophecy Explorer · the data

The data behind the chart

Download:the whole walk (PDF)the chart (PNG)the data (CSV)all downloads

74 links: 14 fulfilled inside the Old Testament, 34 fulfilled in Christ, and 26 arcs for six contested passages, each drawn once for each of the three end-times views. Each row says where the link starts and where it lands, the kind of fulfilment, the test it meets and what it rests on.

Scripture quotations are taken from the NET Bible® Second Edition (New English Translation), © 1996–2024 Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C. All rights reserved. Permission to quote granted by David Austin, Permission Director, Biblical Studies Press, July 1, 2026. NET Bible text reproduced by permission. No derivative works permitted.

Every link on the chart: where it starts and where it lands, the view, the kind of fulfilment, the test it meets, the stop that walks it, and whether the walk has a record check for it. Each row opens to what the view says, the sources and the notes.
From → to	View	Kind	Test	Stop	Record check
Band 1: fulfilled inside the Old Testament (gold) 14 rows
Joshua 6:26 → 1 Kings 16:34	Old Testament	Prediction	B	1
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at 1 Kings 16:34 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The curse on whoever rebuilds Jericho; Kings records Hiel's loss of two sons and names Joshua's word. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 1 Read 2026-10-28
1 Samuel 2:27-36 → 1 Kings 2:27	Old Testament	Prediction	B	1
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at 1 Kings 2:27 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The word against Eli's house; Kings says Abiathar's removal fulfilled it. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 1 Read 2026-10-28
Genesis 50:24-25 → Exodus 13:19	Old Testament	Prediction	B	1
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at Exodus 13:19 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Joseph's oath about his bones; Exodus repeats his words as Moses carries them out. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 1 Read 2026-10-28
Genesis 15:18-21 → Joshua 21:43-45	Old Testament	Prediction \| Partial now, full later	B	6
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at Joshua 21:43-45 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction \| Partial now, full later · judgment Note Joshua says every promise was realized. Dispensational writers hold that the land promise still awaits a fuller, future fulfilment; the kind is disputed, so the link carries two labels. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Argued on this site What About the Land Promises to Israel? (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 6 Read 2026-10-28
2 Samuel 7:12-13 → 1 Kings 8:20	Old Testament	Prediction \| Partial now, full later	B	6
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at 1 Kings 8:20 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction \| Partial now, full later · judgment Note Solomon says the LORD kept the promise of a son who builds the house. The New Testament reads the same promise as reaching further, to Christ (see the band 2 links from 2 Samuel 7). Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Argued on this site Already Reigning, Not Yet Fully Come (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 6 Read 2026-10-28
1 Kings 11:29-39 → 1 Kings 12:15	Old Testament	Prediction	B	1
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at 1 Kings 12:15 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Ahijah's torn cloak and the ten tribes; Kings says the split came about to fulfil Ahijah's word. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 1 Read 2026-10-28
1 Kings 13:2 → 2 Kings 23:15-16	Old Testament	Prediction	B	1	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at 2 Kings 23:16 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The man of God names Josiah; Kings records Josiah burning the bones on the altar at Bethel. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 1. Walk Stop 1 Read 2026-10-28
1 Kings 14:10-11 → 1 Kings 15:29	Old Testament	Prediction	B	1
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at 1 Kings 15:29 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Ahijah's word against Jeroboam's house; Baasha wipes it out 'in keeping with the Lord’s message that he had spoken through his servant Ahijah'. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 1 Read 2026-10-28
1 Kings 21:23 → 2 Kings 9:36-37	Old Testament	Prediction	B	1
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at 2 Kings 9:36 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Elijah's word about Jezebel; Jehu quotes it when she dies. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 1 Read 2026-10-28
2 Kings 10:30 → 2 Kings 15:12	Old Testament	Prediction	B	1
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at 2 Kings 15:12 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Jehu's dynasty to the fourth generation; Kings marks its end with Zechariah. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 1 Read 2026-10-28
2 Kings 20:17-18 → 2 Kings 24:13	Old Testament	Prediction	B	1
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at 2 Kings 24:13 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Isaiah tells Hezekiah his treasures will go to Babylon; Kings records Nebuchadnezzar taking them. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 1 Read 2026-10-28
Jeremiah 25:11-12 → 2 Chronicles 36:21-23	Old Testament	Prediction	B	1	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at 2 Chronicles 36:21 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Jeremiah's seventy years; Chronicles closes on them and on Cyrus's decree. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 1. Walk Stop 1 Read 2026-10-28
Jeremiah 29:10 → Ezra 1:1	Old Testament	Prediction	B	1	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes The Old Testament records it at Ezra 1:1 Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Ezra opens by naming Jeremiah's word as the reason for Cyrus's decree. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 1. Walk Stop 1 Read 2026-10-28
Isaiah 44:28-45:1 → Ezra 1:1-4	Old Testament	Prediction	B	1	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes Why it is drawn B: the Old Testament records its own fulfilment Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Isaiah names Cyrus and the rebuilt temple; Ezra records Cyrus's decree. Ezra names Jeremiah, not Isaiah, as the word fulfilled, so this link rests on the match in content (Cyrus by name, the temple rebuilt). Josephus (Antiquities 11.1.2) says Cyrus read Isaiah's prophecy. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 1. Walk Stop 1 Read 2026-10-28
Band 2: fulfilled in Christ (green) 34 rows
Isaiah 7:14 → Matthew 1:22-23	New Testament	Prediction \| Pattern	A	4
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 1:22 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction \| Pattern · judgment Note Readers differ on the kind. Some read a direct prediction of the virgin birth; others read a sign given in Ahaz's day (Isaiah 7:16) that Matthew sees filled to the full in Jesus. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 4 Read 2026-10-28
Micah 5:2 → Matthew 2:5-6	New Testament	Prediction	A	3	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 2:5 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The chief priests and scribes answer Herod from Micah. Matthew's wording differs from Micah's in the NET (see the record check). Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 3. Walk Stop 3 Read 2026-10-28
Hosea 11:1 → Matthew 2:15	New Testament	Pattern	A	4
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 2:15 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Pattern · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Hosea looks back on the exodus; Matthew sees the Son relive Israel's story. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 4 Read 2026-10-28
Jeremiah 31:15 → Matthew 2:17-18	New Testament	Pattern	A	2
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 2:17 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Pattern · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Rachel weeping at the exile; Matthew hears it again at Bethlehem. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 2 Read 2026-10-28
Isaiah 40:3 → Matthew 3:3	New Testament	Prediction	A	2
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 3:3 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The voice in the wilderness; Matthew says John is the one Isaiah spoke of. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 2 Read 2026-10-28
Isaiah 9:1-2 → Matthew 4:14-16	New Testament	Prediction	A	2
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 4:14 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Light on Galilee of the nations. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 2 Read 2026-10-28
Isaiah 53:4 → Matthew 8:17	New Testament	Prediction	A	5
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 8:17 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Matthew applies the servant's bearing of sickness to Jesus' healings. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 5 Read 2026-10-28
Isaiah 42:1-4 → Matthew 12:17-21	New Testament	Prediction	A	2
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 12:17 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The longest quotation in Matthew's set: the servant who will not break a bruised reed. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 2 Read 2026-10-28
Isaiah 6:9-10 → Matthew 13:14-15	New Testament	Pattern	A	2
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 13:14 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Pattern · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The dulled hearing of Isaiah's day happens again to Jesus' hearers. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 2 Read 2026-10-28
Psalm 78:2 → Matthew 13:35	New Testament	Pattern	A	2
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 13:35 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Pattern · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note A psalm of Asaph, called 'the prophet' by Matthew; teaching in parables. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 2 Read 2026-10-28
Malachi 3:1 → Matthew 11:10	New Testament	Prediction	A	2
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 11:10 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Jesus says John is the messenger who prepares the way. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 2 Read 2026-10-28
Malachi 4:5-6 → Matthew 17:11-13	New Testament	Prediction \| Partial now, full later	A	7
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 17:12 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction \| Partial now, full later · judgment Note Jesus says both that Elijah 'does indeed come first and will restore all things' and that he 'has already come' in John (Matthew 17:11-13). Readers differ on whether a further coming remains. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 7 Read 2026-10-28
Zechariah 9:9 → Matthew 21:4-5	New Testament	Prediction	A	3
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 21:4 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The king on a donkey; Matthew also draws on Isaiah 62:11 for the opening words. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 3 Read 2026-10-28
Zechariah 11:12-13 → Matthew 27:9-10	New Testament	Pattern	A	2	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Matthew 27:9 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Pattern · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Thirty pieces of silver and the potter. Matthew names Jeremiah; the closest words are Zechariah's (see the record check). Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 2. Walk Stop 2 Read 2026-10-28
2 Samuel 7:12-16 → Luke 1:32-33	New Testament	Prediction	A	6
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Luke 1:32 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The angel's announcement: the throne of his father David, a kingdom with no end. An announcement of fulfilment, not a fulfilment formula. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Argued on this site Already Reigning, Not Yet Fully Come (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 6 Read 2026-10-28
Isaiah 61:1-2 → Luke 4:17-21	New Testament	Prediction \| Partial now, full later	A	7
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Luke 4:21 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction \| Partial now, full later · judgment Note 'Today this scripture has been fulfilled even as you heard it being read.' Jesus stops reading before Isaiah's next words, 'the day when our God will seek vengeance' (Isaiah 61:2), which many readers take as the part still to come. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 7 Read 2026-10-28
Isaiah 53:1 → John 12:38	New Testament	Prediction	A	5
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words John 12:38 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note John quotes Isaiah 53:1 and, two verses later, Isaiah 6:10, and says Isaiah said both. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 5 Read 2026-10-28
Psalm 41:9 → John 13:18	New Testament	Pattern	A	2
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words John 13:18 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Pattern · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The friend who shared bread; Jesus applies it to Judas. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 2 Read 2026-10-28
Psalm 22:18 → John 19:24	New Testament	Pattern \| Prediction	A	5
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words John 19:24 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Pattern \| Prediction · judgment Note The soldiers divide the clothes. A psalm of David's suffering; Acts 2:30 calls David a prophet, so readers label it both ways. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 5 Read 2026-10-28
Exodus 12:46 → John 19:36	New Testament	Pattern	A	5
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words John 19:36 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Pattern · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note No bone of the Passover lamb broken (also Numbers 9:12 and Psalm 34:20). Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 5 Read 2026-10-28
Zechariah 12:10 → John 19:37	New Testament	Prediction \| Partial now, full later	A	5
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words John 19:37 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction \| Partial now, full later · judgment Note John applies 'They will look on the one whom they have pierced' (John 19:37) to the cross. Revelation 1:7 uses the same words of his coming, which is a contested passage (Stop 10). Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Argued on this site 6.3 — Christ's Second Coming (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 5 Read 2026-10-28
Joel 2:28-32 → Acts 2:16-21	New Testament	Partial now, full later	A	7
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Acts 2:16 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Partial now, full later · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note 'this is what was spoken about through the prophet Joel' (Acts 2:16). The Spirit is poured out at Pentecost; the signs in the sky and the day of the Lord are read differently by the three views. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 7 Read 2026-10-28
Psalm 16:8-11 → Acts 2:25-31	New Testament	Prediction	A	6
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Acts 2:31 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Peter: 'David by foreseeing this spoke about the resurrection of the Christ' (Acts 2:31). Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 6 Read 2026-10-28
2 Samuel 7:12-16 → Acts 2:30	New Testament	Prediction	A	6
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Acts 2:30 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Acts 2:30 echoes Psalm 132:11, the psalm's restatement of the promise in 2 Samuel 7. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Argued on this site Already Reigning, Not Yet Fully Come (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 6 Read 2026-10-28
Psalm 110:1 → Acts 2:34-35	New Testament	Prediction	A	6
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Acts 2:34 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The most quoted Old Testament verse in the New Testament; Peter applies it to the ascension. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 6 Read 2026-10-28
Deuteronomy 18:15-19 → Acts 3:22-23	New Testament	Prediction	A	2
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Acts 3:22 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The prophet like Moses. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 2 Read 2026-10-28
Psalm 2:1-2 → Acts 4:25-27	New Testament	Pattern \| Prediction	A	2
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Acts 4:27 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Pattern \| Prediction · judgment Note The rulers gather against the Lord's anointed; the church names Herod and Pilate. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 2 Read 2026-10-28
Isaiah 53:7-8 → Acts 8:32-35	New Testament	Prediction	A	5
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Acts 8:35 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Philip starts from this scripture and tells the Ethiopian about Jesus. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 5 Read 2026-10-28
Isaiah 49:6 → Acts 13:47	New Testament	Pattern	A	2
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Acts 13:47 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Pattern · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note The servant as a light for the Gentiles; Paul and Barnabas take it as their commission. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 2 Read 2026-10-28
Amos 9:11-12 → Acts 15:15-17	New Testament	Prediction \| Partial now, full later	A	7
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Acts 15:15 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction \| Partial now, full later · judgment Note James says the prophets agree with Gentiles coming in. Dispensational writers read the rebuilt tent of David as still future for Israel; others read it as fulfilled in the church. A candidate for band 3. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Argued on this site 8. One Citizenship, Not Two (Pulling the Threads: Dispensationalism) Walk Stop 7 Read 2026-10-28
Jeremiah 31:31-34 → Hebrews 8:8-12	New Testament	Prediction \| Partial now, full later	A	7
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Hebrews 8:6 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction \| Partial now, full later · judgment Note The new covenant. Hebrews treats it as in force now; some dispensational writers hold the church shares its blessings while its fulfilment with the house of Israel waits. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Argued on this site 8. One Citizenship, Not Two (Pulling the Threads: Dispensationalism) Walk Stop 7 Read 2026-10-28
Psalm 40:6-8 → Hebrews 10:5-7	New Testament	Pattern	A	5
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Hebrews 10:5 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Pattern · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note 'a body you prepared for me' (Hebrews 10:5). Hebrews quotes the Greek form of the psalm. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 5 Read 2026-10-28
Genesis 12:3 → Galatians 3:8	New Testament	Prediction	A	6
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words Galatians 3:8 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note 'the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, proclaimed the gospel to Abraham ahead of time' (Galatians 3:8). Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 6 Read 2026-10-28
Isaiah 53:5-9 → 1 Peter 2:22-25	New Testament	Prediction	A	5
What it says, the sources and the notes The New Testament’s claim, in its own words 1 Peter 1:10-11 Why it is drawn A: the New Testament says it was fulfilled Kind, and why Prediction · judgment (kind label is this package's call) Note Peter quotes Isaiah 53 without a formula; his claim that the Spirit 'testified beforehand about the sufferings appointed for Christ' is at 1 Peter 1:11. Writers and sources Scripture (NET Second Edition), checked against net_local.db · NET-LOCAL Walk Stop 5 Read 2026-10-28
Band 3: Daniel 9:24-27 7 rows
Daniel 9:25 → Luke 19:37-44	Dispensationalism	View-dependent	C	8	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says The 69 weeks are 483 years of 360 days, from Artaxerxes' decree (445 BC, Nehemiah 2) to the day Jesus presented himself as king at the triumphal entry. Date AD 32 (Anderson: 6 April AD 32, Julian) Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note Walvoord reports Anderson's date and adds that most New Testament chronologers date the entry a year or two earlier. Writers and sources Anderson; Walvoord; Scofield · TL:ev-dan9-69-end/dispensational, TL:ev-dan9-start/dispensational Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-69-end/dispensational (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-start/dispensational (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 8. Argued on this site 1. The Clock That Has to Stop (Pulling the Threads: Dispensationalism) Walk Stop 8 Read 2026-10-28
Daniel 9:27 → Still future (zone beyond the canon)	Dispensationalism	View-dependent	C	8
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says The clock stops after the 69th week. The whole church age falls in the gap. The 70th week is a future seven years, Israel's tribulation, begun when 'the coming prince' confirms a covenant. Date future: seven years after the rapture Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Writers and sources Scofield; Walvoord; Ryrie; Ice · TL:ev-dan9-70th/dispensational Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-70th/dispensational (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Argued on this site 1. The Clock That Has to Stop (Pulling the Threads: Dispensationalism) Walk Stop 8 Read 2026-10-28
Daniel 9:25 → Matthew 3:13-17	Partial Preterism	View-dependent	C	8	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says The 69 weeks run from Ezra's decree (457 BC, Ezra 7) to Jesus' baptism and anointing. Date AD 26 (Gentry, inclusive count from 457 BC) Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note Calculated (The Whole Story's research notes): elapsed years from 457 BC give AD 27; Gentry's AD 26 is an inclusive count. Other writers in the view (Kline, Riddlebarger) start at Cyrus, 538 BC, and read the numbers as symbolic. Writers and sources Gentry; Mauro · TL:ev-dan9-69-end/partial-preterist/ezra-457, TL:ev-dan9-start/partial-preterist/ezra-457 Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-69-end/partial-preterist/ezra-457 (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-start/partial-preterist/ezra-457 (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 8. Argued on this site 2. What the Root Costs Partial Preterism (Pulling the Threads: Dispensationalism) Walk Stop 8 Read 2026-10-28
Daniel 9:27 → Matthew 27:50-51	Partial Preterism	View-dependent	C	8
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says The 70th week follows the 69th with no gap. The Messiah confirms the covenant by his death and ends sacrifice in the middle of the week. Date c. AD 30 (the cross, in the middle of the 70th week) Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note Target verse is this package's choice: the writers name the cross, not a verse. Matthew 27:50-51 is the death and the torn temple curtain. Writers and sources Gentry; Mauro; Kline · TL:ev-dan9-70th/partial-preterist/continuous-christ, TL:ev-dan9-70th/partial-preterist/kline-covenant Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-70th/partial-preterist/continuous-christ (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-70th/partial-preterist/kline-covenant (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Argued on this site 2. What the Root Costs Partial Preterism (Pulling the Threads: Dispensationalism) Walk Stop 8 Read 2026-10-28
Daniel 9:26 → AD 66–70 (zone beyond the canon)	Partial Preterism	View-dependent	C	8
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says The destruction of the city and sanctuary (9:26) is the consequence of the Messiah being cut off. Gentry places it outside the seventy weeks; Chilton and Riddlebarger read the abomination as the Roman armies of AD 70. Date AD 70 Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Writers and sources Gentry; Chilton; Riddlebarger · TL:ev-dan9-70th/partial-preterist/continuous-christ, TL:ev-dan9-70th/partial-preterist/ad70-seal, TL:ev-dan9-70th/partial-preterist/amil-church-age Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-70th/partial-preterist/continuous-christ (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-70th/partial-preterist/ad70-seal (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-70th/partial-preterist/amil-church-age (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Argued on this site 2. What the Root Costs Partial Preterism (Pulling the Threads: Dispensationalism) Walk Stop 8 Read 2026-10-28
Daniel 9:25 → Matthew 3:13-17	Full Preterism	View-dependent	C	8
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says Green ends the 62 weeks at Jesus' baptism, about AD 28, counting from Cyrus (538 BC) with symbolic periods. Preston dates the 69-week mark to 'the coming of Jesus' and gives no start year. Date c. AD 28 (Green) Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Writers and sources Green; Preston · TL:ev-dan9-69-end/full-preterist/green, TL:ev-dan9-69-end/full-preterist/corporate-body Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-69-end/full-preterist/green (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-69-end/full-preterist/corporate-body (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Argued on this site Five Statements: Full Preterism (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 8 Read 2026-10-28
Daniel 9:27 → AD 66–70 (zone beyond the canon)	Full Preterism	View-dependent	C	8	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says The cross falls in the first half of the 70th week and the Jewish War (AD 66-70) is the second half; the week ends in AD 70. Date c. AD 28/30 to AD 70 Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note Calculated (Timeline data): with the cross at AD 30 and the end at AD 70, Preston's 'week' is about 40 years long. Preston calls the AD 30-70 span a 'divinely ordained' 40-year period. Writers and sources Preston; Green; Sullivan · TL:ev-dan9-70th/full-preterist/corporate-body, TL:ev-dan9-70th/full-preterist/green, TL:ev-dan9-70th/full-preterist/record-check Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-70th/full-preterist/corporate-body (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-70th/full-preterist/green (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-dan9-70th/full-preterist/record-check (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 8. Argued on this site Five Statements: Full Preterism (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 8 Read 2026-10-28
Band 3: Matthew 24 (the Olivet Discourse) 4 rows
Matthew 24:4-31 → Still future (zone beyond the canon)	Dispensationalism	View-dependent	C	9	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says Matthew 24-25 answers the questions about the sign of his coming and the end of the age with events still future: the tribulation and the visible return. The words 'this generation' mean the generation that sees the signs; Scofield read it as the Jewish people. Date future Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note Record check (Timeline Stop 11): date-setters inside the view (Lindsey, Whisenant) pointed to 1988. Scofield, Walvoord and Ice, as read for the Timeline, set no dates. Writers and sources Scofield; Ice; Walvoord · TL:ev-olivet/dispensational Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-olivet/dispensational (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 9. Argued on this site 6.3 — Christ's Second Coming (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 9 Read 2026-10-28
Luke 21:20-24 → AD 66–70 (zone beyond the canon)	Dispensationalism	View-dependent	C	9
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says Ice reads Luke 21:20-24 as the AD 70 destruction of Jerusalem, a judgment on the Jewish people. The temple of Matthew 24:15 is desecrated, not destroyed, so Matthew's discourse points beyond AD 70. Date AD 70 Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Writers and sources Ice; Scofield · TL:ev-jerusalem-70/dispensational, ICE-MATT24-3 Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-jerusalem-70/dispensational (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| Thomas Ice, 'An Interpretation of Matthew 24-25 (Part 3)', Pre-Trib Research Center, 2018-05-14, pre-trib.org/dr-thomas-ice/popup/text/print/118 [read 2026-10-28 (through the fetch tool): the A.D. 70 destruction of Jerusalem was a judgment upon the Jewish people (Luke 21:20-24 section). Paraphrased, not quoted; 2026-10-28] Argued on this site 6.3 — Christ's Second Coming (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 9 Read 2026-10-28
Matthew 24:1-35 → AD 66–70 (zone beyond the canon)	Partial Preterism	View-dependent	C	9
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says The words 'this generation' mean the people Jesus was speaking to. The great tribulation is the Roman war on Jerusalem, and the coming on the clouds is judgment language, fulfilled in AD 70. Christ's bodily return is still future. Date AD 66-70 Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Writers and sources Sproul (via Ligonier); Gentry; Chilton · TL:ev-olivet/partial-preterist, TL:ev-tribulation/partial-preterist, TL:ev-return-christ/partial-preterist/postmil Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-olivet/partial-preterist (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-tribulation/partial-preterist (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-return-christ/partial-preterist/postmil (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Argued on this site 6.3 — Christ's Second Coming (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 9 Read 2026-10-28
Matthew 24:1-25:46 → AD 66–70 (zone beyond the canon)	Full Preterism	View-dependent	C	9
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says The discourse is one event, not two. The coming, the gathering of the elect and the end of the age all fall in the AD 70 window; nothing is left for the future. Date AD 70 Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Writers and sources Preston; Sullivan · TL:ev-olivet/full-preterist Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-olivet/full-preterist (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Argued on this site The Argument Full Preterism Leads With, and Where Each Link Breaks (Pulling the Threads: Full Preterism) Walk Stop 9 Read 2026-10-28
Band 3: Revelation 5 rows
Revelation 4:1-22:5 → Still future (zone beyond the canon)	Dispensationalism	View-dependent	C	10	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says Revelation was written about AD 95 under Domitian. Chapters 4-19 describe the period just before Christ's return; chapter 20 a literal thousand years on earth; then the new creation. Date future; written c. AD 95 Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note Record check (Timeline Stop 12): Irenaeus (c. AD 180) places John's vision near the end of Domitian's reign. Writers and sources Walvoord; Ice; Scofield · TL:ev-revelation-date/dispensational, TL:ev-millennium/dispensational Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-revelation-date/dispensational (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-millennium/dispensational (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 10. Argued on this site Introduction (Revelation: A Walk-Through) Walk Stop 10 Read 2026-10-28
Revelation 4:1-19:21 → AD 66–70 (zone beyond the canon)	Partial Preterism	View-dependent	C	10	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says Revelation was written before AD 70, and most of it concerns the judgment that fell on Jerusalem and the persecution under Nero. The beast is Nero. Date AD 64-70; written under Nero (before June 68, Gentry) Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note Record check (Timeline Stop 12): the early date rests on evidence inside the book; the earliest outside witness, Irenaeus, points to the end of Domitian's reign. Writers and sources Gentry; Chilton · TL:ev-revelation-date/partial-preterist, TL:ev-antichrist/partial-preterist Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-revelation-date/partial-preterist (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-antichrist/partial-preterist (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 10. Argued on this site Introduction (Revelation: A Walk-Through) Walk Stop 10 Read 2026-10-28
Revelation 20:1-6 → The present age (zone beyond the canon)	Partial Preterism	View-dependent	C	10
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says The thousand years are the present age between Christ's two comings: a growing gospel age before the return (postmillennial) or simply the church age (amillennial). Date the present age Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Writers and sources Gentry; Mathison; Chilton; Riddlebarger · TL:ev-millennium/partial-preterist/postmil, TL:ev-millennium/partial-preterist/amil Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-millennium/partial-preterist/postmil (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-millennium/partial-preterist/amil (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Argued on this site 6.1 — Satan's Judgment (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 10 Read 2026-10-28
Revelation 20:11-22:5 → Still future (zone beyond the canon)	Partial Preterism	View-dependent	C	10
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says Christ's visible, bodily return, one general resurrection, the final judgment and the new creation are still to come. Date future Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Writers and sources Gentry; Chilton; Riddlebarger; Sproul · TL:ev-return-christ/partial-preterist/postmil, TL:ev-return-christ/partial-preterist/amil, TL:ev-resurrection-general/partial-preterist Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-return-christ/partial-preterist/postmil (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-return-christ/partial-preterist/amil (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-resurrection-general/partial-preterist (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Argued on this site 6.5 — The Final Judgment (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 10 Read 2026-10-28
Revelation 1:1-22:21 → AD 66–70 (zone beyond the canon)	Full Preterism	View-dependent	C	10	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says Revelation was written before Jerusalem fell; Babylon is first-century Jerusalem. Its 'soon' is literal, and all of it, the thousand years (AD 30-70) and the return included, was fulfilled by AD 70. Date AD 70; written before AD 70 Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note Record check (Timeline Stop 13): by the view's own account the AD 70 return and resurrection were unseen, so the record can neither confirm nor refute them. Writers and sources Preston; Stevens (IPA); King · TL:ev-revelation-date/full-preterist/corporate-body, TL:ev-millennium/full-preterist/corporate-body, TL:ev-return-christ/full-preterist/corporate-body Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-revelation-date/full-preterist/corporate-body (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-millennium/full-preterist/corporate-body (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-return-christ/full-preterist/corporate-body (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 10. Argued on this site What Partial Preterism's Own Reading Costs, Tested Against Full Preterism's Own Critique (Pulling the Threads: Full Preterism) Walk Stop 10 Read 2026-10-28
Band 3: Ezekiel 38-39 3 rows
Ezekiel 38:1-39:16 → Still future (zone beyond the canon)	Dispensationalism	View-dependent	C	11	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says Gog's invasion of a restored Israel is future. Ice defends the pretribulational, post-rapture timing, after the rapture and before the tribulation, and notes a second dispensational view that puts it near the middle of the tribulation. Scofield (1917) put it in the future day of the LORD and identified the northern powers as 'headed up by Russia'. Date future (Ice: after the rapture, before the tribulation) Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note Record check (judgment): Scofield's 1917 note already named Russia; the allies and the reasons were reassigned as world politics changed (the Soviet Union, later Russia with Iran and Turkey). Pulling the Threads: Dispensationalism, section 11, documents it and notes the objection that Soviet-as-Magog was a popular layer, not doctrine. Writers and sources Ice; Scofield · ICE-EZEK38-27, ICE-EZEK38-24, SCOFIELD-EZEK38 Source Thomas Ice, 'Ezekiel 38 & 39 (Part 27)', Pre-Trib Research Center, 2018-06-12, pre-trib.org/ezekiel-38-39/message/ezekiel-38-39-part-27 [read; title, date and the phrase 'the pretribulational, post-rapture view of the timing' rechecked 2026-10-28 (through the fetch tool). Notes PDF not read; 2026-10-28] \| Thomas Ice, 'Ezekiel 38 & 39 (Part 24)', Pre-Trib Research Center, 2018-06-12, pre-trib.org/dr-thomas-ice/popup/text/print/224 [read 2026-10-28 (through the fetch tool): 'A second view sees it taking place in the first half, towards the middle of the tribulation'; names not given on the page; 2026-10-28] \| C. I. Scofield, Scofield Reference Notes (1917 text as reproduced online), note at Ezekiel 38:2, studylight.org/commentaries/eng/srn/ezekiel-38.html [read; quoted phrases rechecked against the page 2026-10-28 (through the fetch tool); printed copy not seen; 2026-10-28] Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 11. Argued on this site 11. No Brake on the Reassignment (Pulling the Threads: Dispensationalism) Walk Stop 11 Read 2026-10-28
Ezekiel 38:1-39:16 → Esther 9:1-16	Partial Preterism	View-dependent	C	11	yes
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says James B. Jordan proposes that 'the book of Esther describes the fulfillment of the battle of Gog and Magog'; Haman and his allies are Gog. Gary DeMar's ministry presents the battle as past and confirmed in Esther. Date Persian period, reign of Xerxes Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note Not every partial preterist holds this; it is the one past-fulfilment reading found by a named writer in the view's circle. No site book argues it. Record check (judgment): Ezekiel 39:10 has Israel taking the loot of those who looted them, while Esther 9:10, 15 and 16 say the Jews took no plunder; Ezekiel 39's seven years of burning weapons and seven months of burying the dead have no parallel in Esther. Added 28 Oct. Writers and sources Jordan; DeMar (American Vision) · JORDAN-GOG-2018, AV-DEMAR-GOG-2025 Source James B. Jordan, 'The Battle of Gog and Magog', Theopolis Institute, 2018-01-16, theopolisinstitute.com/the-battle-of-gog-and-magog/ [read; the sentence quoted rechecked against the page 2026-10-28 (through the fetch tool); 2026-10-28] \| American Vision, 'The Battle of Gog and Magog is Past', 2025-11-03, americanvision.org/posts/the-battle-of-gog-and-magog-is-past (a page describing Gary DeMar's teaching) [read: listing page only; DeMar's own argument not confirmed; 2026-10-28] Record check A record check (judgment) is in Stop 11. Walk Stop 11 Read 2026-10-28
Ezekiel 38:1-39:16 → AD 66–70 (zone beyond the canon)	Full Preterism	View-dependent	C	11
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says Baker places the Gog and Magog war in the AD 66-70 great tribulation, as the latter days of Israel and the true Israel (the Church). Date AD 66-70 Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note No site book argues this reading; Pulling the Threads: Full Preterism, Seam Ten, names Baker's Gog volume by title only. Second-hand: from the project's Brad Baker dossier v19 (section 2G), which read Baker's volume 7. Not read directly this session. King, Preston and Stevens on Gog not found. Writers and sources Baker · PROJ-BAKER-DOSSIER Source Brad Baker Dossier v19, section 2G (eschatology project library), summarizing Baker, 'The Timing of the Gog & Magog War' / 'The Mystery of Gog & Magog Revealed', manifestedsonsofgodad70.wordpress.com [second-hand (project dossier); placement rechecked against dossier v19 section 2G on 2026-10-28; Baker's text not read; 2026-10-28] Walk Stop 11 Read 2026-10-28
Band 3: Revelation 20:7-9 3 rows
Revelation 20:7-9 → Still future (zone beyond the canon)	Dispensationalism	View-dependent	C	11
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says After the literal thousand years Satan is released, the nations (Gog and Magog) rebel and are destroyed. Scofield's note on Ezekiel 38:2 says the prophecy also 'includes the final revolt of the nations at the close of the kingdom-age'. Date future, at the end of the thousand years Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Writers and sources Scofield; Walvoord · SCOFIELD-EZEK38, TL:ev-millennium/dispensational Source C. I. Scofield, Scofield Reference Notes (1917 text as reproduced online), note at Ezekiel 38:2, studylight.org/commentaries/eng/srn/ezekiel-38.html [read; quoted phrases rechecked against the page 2026-10-28 (through the fetch tool); printed copy not seen; 2026-10-28] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-millennium/dispensational (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] Argued on this site The Devil's Final Judgment (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 11 Read 2026-10-28
Revelation 20:7-9 → Still future (zone beyond the canon)	Partial Preterism	View-dependent	C	11
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says At the end of the present age Satan is released for a short time, a final apostasy follows, and Christ returns (amillennial, Riddlebarger). The postmillennial reading (Gentry) agrees on the timing: the revolt comes after the long reign of the gospel, near the end of history, and the fire from heaven is Christ's return. Date future, shortly before Christ's return Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note Postmillennial placement rests on one writer (Gentry, 2014 blog post, read). Other postmillennial writers not read. Writers and sources Riddlebarger; Gentry · TL:ev-antichrist/partial-preterist/amil, TL:ev-return-christ/partial-preterist/amil, GENTRY-FINALBATTLE-2014 Source The Whole Story data v2, row ev-antichrist/partial-preterist/amil (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-return-christ/partial-preterist/amil (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| Kenneth L. Gentry Jr., 'Final Battle = Final Collapse?', Postmillennial Worldview, 2014-09-05, postmillennialworldview.com/2014/09/05/final-battle-final-collapse/ [read 2026-10-28 (through the fetch tool): rebellion after the thousand years, near the end of history; fire from heaven is Christ's second advent; 2026-10-28] Argued on this site 6.1 — Satan's Judgment (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 11 Read 2026-10-28
Revelation 20:7-9 → AD 66–70 (zone beyond the canon)	Full Preterism	View-dependent	C	11
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says The thousand years end in AD 70, so the Gog and Magog revolt falls in AD 66-70 (Baker). Preston and King end the millennium at AD 70. Not all full preterists agree: a rival reading (Duncan McKenzie) begins the thousand years at AD 70. Date AD 66-70 Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note Baker second-hand (project dossier, placement rechecked against the dossier 2026-10-28). The millennium-timing split inside full preterism is from Full Preterism Dossier v79, section 31 (second-hand). Writers and sources Baker; Preston; King · PROJ-BAKER-DOSSIER, TL:ev-millennium/full-preterist/corporate-body, PROJ-FP-DOSSIER-31 Source Brad Baker Dossier v19, section 2G (eschatology project library), summarizing Baker, 'The Timing of the Gog & Magog War' / 'The Mystery of Gog & Magog Revealed', manifestedsonsofgodad70.wordpress.com [second-hand (project dossier); placement rechecked against dossier v19 section 2G on 2026-10-28; Baker's text not read; 2026-10-28] \| The Whole Story data v2, row ev-millennium/full-preterist/corporate-body (its own sources listed there) [second-hand] \| Full Preterism Dossier v79, section 31 (eschatology project library): millennium timing and 'Premillennial Preterism' (Duncan McKenzie) [second-hand (project dossier); 2026-10-28] Argued on this site What Partial Preterism's Own Reading Costs, Tested Against Full Preterism's Own Critique (Pulling the Threads: Full Preterism) Walk Stop 11 Read 2026-10-28
Band 3: Romans 11:25-27 4 rows
Romans 11:25-27 → Still future (zone beyond the canon)	Dispensationalism	View-dependent	C	11
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says The words 'all Israel' mean Israel living at the time, saved as a nation, a single future event when the Deliverer comes out of Zion at the second coming. Date future, when Christ returns Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Writers and sources Walvoord · WALVOORD-ISRAEL-RESTORATION Source John F. Walvoord, 'Eschatological Problems IX: Israel's Restoration', walvoord.com/node/26 (from Bibliotheca Sacra via Galaxie; issue not shown on the page) [read; quoted phrases rechecked against the page 2026-10-28 (through the fetch tool); 2026-10-28] Argued on this site 8. One Citizenship, Not Two (Pulling the Threads: Dispensationalism) Walk Stop 11 Read 2026-10-28
Romans 11:25-27 → The present age (zone beyond the canon)	Partial Preterism postmil	View-dependent	C	11
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says Gentry: Israel's salvation begins in the first century and comes to full expression later in history, when Israel turns to Christ in full numbers: 'future, massive conversions among the Jews' before the return. Date within history, before Christ's return Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Writers and sources Gentry; Hodge (reposted by Gentry) · GENTRY-POSTMIL-PAUL-2020, HODGE-ROM11-PMW-2026 Source Kenneth L. Gentry Jr., 'Postmillennial Paul', Postmillennial Worldview, 2020-04-21, with the author's comments of 2020-09-01, postmillennialworldview.com/2020/04/21/8258/ [read; quoted phrases rechecked against the page 2026-10-28 (through the fetch tool); 2026-10-28] \| Charles Hodge on Romans 11:25-26, reposted as 'Hodge on Romans 11', Postmillennial Worldview, 2026-03-10, postmillennialworldview.com/2026/03/10/25490/ [read (through the fetch tool's summary); 2026-10-28] Argued on this site What About the Land Promises to Israel? (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 11 Read 2026-10-28
Romans 11:25-27 → The present age (zone beyond the canon)	Partial Preterism amil	View-dependent	C	11
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says Gentry's summary of the amillennial reading: 'the Church fulfills Israel's promises by becoming the true Israel'. Lee Irons, an amillennialist, reads 'all Israel' as the whole church, Jews and Gentiles together. Date the present age Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note One amillennial primary source read (Irons). Amillennialists differ: Merkle (JETS 2000) reads 'all Israel' as the elect Jews of every age and does not label his view amillennial. Writers and sources Gentry (describing amillennialists); Irons · GENTRY-POSTMIL-PAUL-2020, IRONS-ROM11-1997 Source Kenneth L. Gentry Jr., 'Postmillennial Paul', Postmillennial Worldview, 2020-04-21, with the author's comments of 2020-09-01, postmillennialworldview.com/2020/04/21/8258/ [read; quoted phrases rechecked against the page 2026-10-28 (through the fetch tool); 2026-10-28] \| Lee Irons, 'Paul's Theology of Israel's Future: A Nonmillennial Interpretation of Romans 11', Reformation & Revival 6/2, Spring 1997, gospelstudies.org.uk/biblicalstudies/pdf/ref-rev/06-2/6-2_irons.pdf [read 2026-10-28 (through the fetch tool): 'all Israel' = the whole church, Jews and Gentiles; Irons includes himself among amillennialists; 2026-10-28] Argued on this site What About the Land Promises to Israel? (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 11 Read 2026-10-28
Romans 11:25-27 → AD 66–70 (zone beyond the canon)	Full Preterism	View-dependent	C	11
What it says, the sources and the notes What the view says The words 'all Israel' mean the faithful remnant together with the grafted-in Gentiles, matured and closed at AD 70 (Sullivan). Date by AD 70 Why it is drawn C: the three end-times views map it differently Kind, and why View-dependent · sourced (where each view places it) Note No full preterist paper on the site argues Romans 11; Three Ways is the nearest landing. Second-hand: from the project's Full Preterism Dossier v79, section 16F. Sullivan's article not read directly this session. Writers and sources Sullivan · PROJ-FP-DOSSIER-16F Source Full Preterism Dossier v79, section 16F (eschatology project library), on Michael Sullivan, 'How "All Israel" Was Saved in AD 70: Romans 9-11', fullpreterism.com, posted 2026-06-20, revised 2026-08-26 [second-hand (project dossier); placement rechecked against dossier v79 section 16F on 2026-10-28; Sullivan's article not read; 2026-10-28] Argued on this site What About the Land Promises to Israel? (Three Ways People Read the End of the Story) Walk Stop 11 Read 2026-10-28

Considered and not drawn

30 links the research looked at and left out, with the test each would meet and what would bring it in.

Links the research considered and did not draw: from and to, the test each would meet, why it is out, and what would bring it in.
From → to	Test	Why it is not drawn	What would bring it in
(no single text; 'the prophets') → Matthew 2:23	A	A real fulfilment formula, but no one Old Testament verse says that Jesus 'would be called a Nazarene'; Isaiah 11:1 ('branch') is a common proposal, not a quotation.	a marker on Matthew 2:23 for claims with no single source
(the scriptures, no quotation) → Matthew 26:54; 26:56	A	General appeals to the scriptures with no text quoted.	never: nothing to draw
Jeremiah 28:16 → Jeremiah 28:17	B	Prophecy and outcome in the same chapter: Hananiah dies that year. Too short to draw at chapter scale.	the chart gets a verse-level inset
Daniel 5:25-28 → Daniel 5:30	B	Same chapter; the writing on the wall comes true that night.	the chart gets a verse-level inset
2 Kings 1:4, 6 → 2 Kings 1:17	B	Same chapter; Ahaziah dies as Elijah said.	the chart gets a verse-level inset
2 Kings 7:1 → 2 Kings 7:16-18	B	Same chapter; Elisha's flour prices.	the chart gets a verse-level inset
1 Kings 17:1 → 1 Kings 18:1, 45	B	The drought's end is told, not marked as a fulfilment of a word.	never
'his servants the prophets' → 2 Kings 17:13, 23; 24:2	B	General statements that the prophets warned; no single prophecy named.	never
Isaiah 25:8 → 1 Corinthians 15:54	A (future tense: 'will happen')	Paul says the saying 'will happen' at the resurrection: a promise of future fulfilment, and the resurrection is itself contested between the views. Not on the chart's list of contested passages.	the resurrection becomes a seventh contested passage
Isaiah 53:12 → Luke 22:37	A	Strong formula ('must be fulfilled in me'); left out to keep Isaiah 53 from crowding the chart (four Isaiah 53 links are drawn).	the cap rises
Zechariah 13:7 → Matthew 26:31	A	Jesus quotes it ('it is written'); left out for the cap.	the cap rises
Psalm 35:19; 69:4 → John 15:25	A	Formula ('to fulfill the word'); left out for the cap; two possible source psalms.	the cap rises
Psalm 69:25; 109:8 → Acts 1:20	A	'It is written' of Judas; left out for the cap.	the cap rises
Psalm 2:7 → Acts 13:33; Hebrews 1:5	A	Left out for the cap; Psalm 2 is drawn at Acts 4.	the cap rises
Psalm 110:4 → Hebrews 5:6; 7:17	A	Left out for the cap; Psalm 110:1 is drawn at Acts 2.	the cap rises
Isaiah 11:10 → Romans 15:12	A	'As it is written'; left out for the cap.	the cap rises
Hosea 1:10; 2:23 → Romans 9:25-26	A	Paul applies Hosea to Gentiles; left out for the cap.	the cap rises
Genesis 22:18; 13:15; 17:8 → Galatians 3:16	A	Paul's 'seed' argument; the source verse is not certain.	a rule for multiple-source links
Psalm 118:22 → Matthew 21:42	none	'Have you never read': a quotation, not a fulfilment claim.	never under this rule
Psalm 22:1 → Matthew 27:46	none	Jesus prays the psalm; no fulfilment claim is made.	never under this rule
Psalm 69:9 → John 2:17	none	The disciples 'remembered' it; no fulfilment claim.	never under this rule
Genesis 3:15 → (Romans 16:20; Revelation 12)	none	An allusion, not an explicit claim.	never under this rule
Genesis 49:10 → (no New Testament quotation)	none	Read messianically by many; the New Testament does not quote it as fulfilled.	never under this rule
Isaiah 7:16; 8:4 → 2 Kings 16:9; 17:6	none	The near fulfilment of Ahaz's sign is told in Kings but not marked as fulfilling Isaiah. Mentioned at Stop 4.	never under this rule
Jonah 3:4 → Jonah 3:10	none	A warning withdrawn when Nineveh repented: a conditional prophecy, not a fulfilment. Useful for method.	a 'how prophecy works' panel is added
Daniel 7:13 → Matthew 26:64; Revelation 1:7	C (candidate)	The coming on the clouds; covered inside the Olivet and Revelation passages, not drawn separately.	it becomes its own contested passage
Daniel 12:1-2, 11 → Matthew 24:15, 21	C (inside Olivet)	Covered by the Olivet Discourse arcs.	never: already covered
Isaiah 59:20-21 → Romans 11:26-27	C (inside Romans 11)	Paul's quotation; drawn as part of the Romans 11 contested passage, not as a band 2 link.	never: already covered
Isaiah 65:17 → 2 Peter 3:13; Revelation 21:1	C (candidate)	New heavens and new earth; contested between the views; not on the chart's list.	the new creation becomes a contested passage
(every cross-reference) → (OpenBible.info data)	none	The optional faint background layer of every cross-reference is not drawn: it needs its own decision and a recorded licence version.	a decision to include it, with its licence version recorded

The files

Links (CSV) (38 KB)Views (CSV) (22 KB)Considered, not drawn (CSV) (5 KB)Sources (CSV) (6 KB)

Column guide to the four files

prophecy_links.csv

link_id: The link’s address. It is also the id of the arc in the chart’s SVG.
source_ref / target_ref: Where the promise is, and where it is kept (or, for band 3, where the view puts its fulfilment).
band: 1, 2 or 3.
kind: Prediction, pattern, partial now and full later, or view-dependent. Two labels, joined by a bar, mean Christian readers label the link two ways.
view: all (bands 1 and 2), or one of the three end-times views.
selection_test: A, B or C: why the link is drawn.
nt_claim_wording_ref: Where the New Testament says it, in its own words.
stop: The stop of the walk that covers it.
writers_sources: Who or what the row rests on.
record_check: y when the walk carries a record check (a judgment, labeled as one) for this link.
site_book_link: The book and heading on this site that argue the contested link.
notes: The research’s notes on the row.
ot_record_ref: The Old Testament verse that records a test B fulfilment.
kind_basis: Whether the kind label is sourced or the research’s own call.
passage_group, subview: For band 3: the contested passage, and a sub-view of a view where one is named.
fulfilment_date, what_the_view_says: For band 3: when and how the view reads it.
source_keys, chart_id, read_at: The source registry keys, the id in the chart, and the date the row was read.

prophecy_views.csv

passage, view, subview: The contested passage and the view that reads it this way.
source_ref, fulfilment_target, fulfilment_date: Where the passage starts and where and when the view lands it.
what_the_view_says, writers, source_citation: The view’s reading, the writers who hold it and the source the row rests on.
link_id, basis, read_at, note: The link it belongs to, whether it is sourced or a judgment, when it was read, and a note.

prophecy_considered_not_included.csv

source_ref, target_ref: The link that was considered.
test_it_would_meet: The selection test it would meet.
why_not_drawn, could_join_if: Why it is out, and what would bring it in.

prophecy_sources.csv

source_key, citation: The key that the data rows point to, and the source.
status, read_at: How the source was read (read, second-hand, not confirmed) and when.

The chart as text

Every label on every layer of the chart, in the order the layers draw them.

The chart itself (121 labels)

Prophecy Explorer
Where the Bible’s promises land, and the few places the three end-times views part
Version 1 · The Michlaude Discipleship Project · michlaude.com
How to read it
The bar is the Bible: 66 books in order, each as wide as its chapters.
An arc joins a promise to the place it is kept.
Above the bar: links the Bible itself makes, which
Christians broadly agree on (two layers).
Below the bar: the contested passages, drawn once for
each end-times view, in its own writers’ terms.
Right of Revelation: not books but times, where a view
says a passage was or will be fulfilled.
Genesis
Exodus
Leviticus
Numbers
Deuteronomy
Joshua
Judges
Ruth
1 Samuel
2 Samuel
1 Kings
2 Kings
1 Chronicles
2 Chronicles
Ezra
Neh
Esth
Job
Psalms
Proverbs
Eccl
Song
Isaiah
Jeremiah
Lam
Ezekiel
Dan
Hosea
Joel
Amos
Jonah
Mic
Nah
Hab
Zeph
Zech
Mal
Matthew
Mark
Luke
John
Acts
Romans
1 Cor
2 Cor
Gal
Eph
Phil
Col
1 Thess
2 Thess
1 Tim
2 Tim
Titus
Heb
Jas
1 Pet
2 Pet
1 John
Revelation
Obad
Hag
Phlm
2 John
3 John
Jude
Old Testament: 39 books, 929 chapters
New Testament: 27 books, 260 chapters
Law
History
Poetry and wisdom
Major prophets
Minor prophets
Gospels
Paul's letters
Other letters
Rev.
Beyond the books: when each view
says a contested passage is fulfilled
AD 66–70
The Jewish War and the fall
of Jerusalem
The present age
From Pentecost to Christ's
return
Still future
The last events, as each
view lists them
Key
Above the bar (colour says which band)
Band 1: fulfilled inside the Old Testament
the Old Testament itself records the outcome
Band 2: fulfilled in Christ
the New Testament’s own claim, in its own words
Kind of fulfilment (line pattern)
Prediction: a future event foretold and later occurring
Pattern: an earlier event or person prefigures a later one
Partial now, full later: a first fulfilment, more expected
“(2 labels)”: Christian readers label this link two ways
Below the bar: contested passages, one line per view
Dispensationalism
Partial Preterism
Full Preterism
J
A record check (judgment) for this link is in the walk
Dots mark both ends of a link on the bar
Only links that pass the selection rule are drawn: the New Testament says it was fulfilled, the Old
Testament records its own fulfilment, or the three views map the passage differently. Echoes and
allusions are left out. This chart maps where each view puts a fulfilment; it does not say which is right.

Fulfilled in the Old Testament (15 labels)

1 Kgs 11:29–39 → 1 Kgs 12:15
1 Kgs 14:10–11 → 1 Kgs 15:29
2 Kgs 20:17–18 → 2 Kgs 24:13
2 Kgs 10:30 → 2 Kgs 15:12
1 Kgs 21:23 → 2 Kgs 9:36–37
Gen 50:24–25 → Exod 13:19
2 Sam 7:12–13 → 1 Kgs 8:20 (2 labels)
1 Kgs 13:2 → 2 Kgs 23:15–16
J
1 Sam 2:27–36 → 1 Kgs 2:27
Josh 6:26 → 1 Kgs 16:34
Gen 15:18–21 → Josh 21:43–45 (2 labels)
Isa 44:28–45:1 → Ezra 1:1–4
Jer 25:11–12 → 2 Chr 36:21–23
Jer 29:10 → Ezra 1:1

Fulfilled in Christ (35 labels)

Mal 3:1 → Matt 11:10
Mal 4:5–6 → Matt 17:11–13 (2 labels)
Zech 9:9 → Matt 21:4–5
Mic 5:2 → Matt 2:5–6
J
Zech 11:12–13 → Matt 27:9–10
Hos 11:1 → Matt 2:15
Zech 12:10 → John 19:37 (2 labels)
Joel 2:28–32 → Acts 2:16–21
Amos 9:11–12 → Acts 15:15–17 (2 labels)
Jer 31:15 → Matt 2:17–18
Isa 53:4 → Matt 8:17
Isa 40:3 → Matt 3:3
Isa 42:1–4 → Matt 12:17–21
Isa 61:1–2 → Luke 4:17–21 (2 labels)
Isa 7:14 → Matt 1:22–23 (2 labels)
Isa 9:1–2 → Matt 4:14–16
Isa 6:9–10 → Matt 13:14–15
Isa 53:1 → John 12:38
Isa 53:7–8 → Acts 8:32–35
Isa 49:6 → Acts 13:47
Jer 31:31–34 → Heb 8:8–12 (2 labels)
Ps 78:2 → Matt 13:35
Isa 53:5–9 → 1 Pet 2:22–25
Ps 110:1 → Acts 2:34–35
Ps 41:9 → John 13:18
Ps 22:18 → John 19:24 (2 labels)
Ps 16:8–11 → Acts 2:25–31
Ps 2:1–2 → Acts 4:25–27 (2 labels)
Ps 40:6–8 → Heb 10:5–7
2 Sam 7:12–16 → Luke 1:32–33
2 Sam 7:12–16 → Acts 2:30
Deut 18:15–19 → Acts 3:22–23
Exod 12:46 → John 19:36
Gen 12:3 → Gal 3:8

Dispensationalism (9 labels)

Dispensationalism: Rev 20:7–9 → still future
Dispensationalism: Rev 4:1–22:5 → still future
J
Dispensationalism: Dan 9:25 → Luke 19:37–44
Dispensationalism: Luke 21:20–24 → AD 66–70
Dispensationalism: Rom 11:25–27 → still future
Dispensationalism: Matt 24:4–31 → still future
Dispensationalism: Dan 9:27 → still future
Dispensationalism: Ezek 38:1–39:16 → still future

Partial Preterism (12 labels)

Partial Preterism: Rev 4:1–19:21 → AD 66–70
J
Partial Preterism: Dan 9:25 → Matt 3:13–17
Partial Preterism: Rev 20:1–6 → the present age
Partial Preterism: Dan 9:27 → Matt 27:50–51
Partial Preterism: Rev 20:11–22:5 → still future
Partial Preterism: Rev 20:7–9 → still future
Partial Preterism (postmil): Rom 11:25–27 → the present age
Partial Preterism (amil): Rom 11:25–27 → the present age
Partial Preterism: Matt 24:1–35 → AD 66–70
Partial Preterism: Dan 9:26 → AD 66–70
Partial Preterism: Ezek 38:1–39:16 → Esth 9:1–16

Full Preterism (8 labels)

Full Preterism: Rev 20:7–9 → AD 66–70
Full Preterism: Rev 1:1–22:21 → AD 66–70
J
Full Preterism: Dan 9:25 → Matt 3:13–17
Full Preterism: Rom 11:25–27 → AD 66–70
Full Preterism: Matt 24:1–25:46 → AD 66–70
Full Preterism: Dan 9:27 → AD 66–70
Full Preterism: Ezek 38:1–39:16 → AD 66–70