V. The Vulnerability I Could Not Close

Every system of this kind has a vulnerability. The Islamic near-truth has the historical evidence for the crucifixion, which it had to deny, leaving a crack that honest inquiry can enter. The LDS near-truth has the Book of Abraham.

In 1835, Smith claimed to translate Egyptian papyri purchased at an exhibition. The translation became the Book of Abraham, now canonical as part of the Pearl of Great Price. In 1966, the original papyri were discovered in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Egyptologists examined them. They are standard funerary documents — the Book of Breathings — with no connection whatsoever to Abraham. The translation Smith produced bears no relationship to what the documents actually say.

This is not a translation disagreement. It is a falsification. The man who claimed to be a prophet and translator produced a "translation" of documents that say something entirely different. If the Book of Abraham is false, the claim of prophetic translation is false. If the claim of prophetic translation is false, the Book of Mormon — also produced by claimed translation — cannot be trusted on the basis of that claim. The crack runs straight to the foundation.

The person who finds this crack and is willing to follow it honestly is reachable. The disciple's job is to know it is there.

VI. The Limitation I Did Not Anticipate

I should have anticipated it. In retrospect, it was always there.

I designed a system that would use the Christian Scriptures — honor them, cite them, carry them in the hands of its missionaries — while simultaneously installing the mechanisms to neutralize them. The "correctly translated" clause, the living prophet's superseding word, the JST revisions. I was confident the neutralization was sufficient.

What I miscalculated was the nature of the Text itself.

The record I transmitted is not a record of the institution's achievements. It is a record of the institution's indictment. The Gospels contain Jesus's condemnation of the religious professionals who had every credential and the wrong orientation of heart. The letters of Paul, written before any canon existed, challenge institutional authority and warn in explicit terms against gospels delivered by angels. The book of Revelation addresses compromise and complacency inside the churches — not outside them. The canon that was eventually assembled and transmitted across centuries contains material that stands in perpetual judgment of the institution transmitting it.

I did not preserve a monument to institutional Christianity. I preserved the charter of its critique.

This matters because the Person described in that record did not derive His authority from the institution. He preceded it. He judged it. He promised that the gates of hell would not prevail against what He was building — and what He was building was not dependent on any institution's survival. The institution carried the record. The record carried the Person. The Person entered from outside the system, judges all systems from outside them, and cannot be captured inside any of them, including this one.

The disciple who reads the Text carefully and arrives at the Person finds that the Person is not the product of their reading. They discover that the Person was already there. The reading cleared the way. What walked through the cleared way came from outside it.

I could replicate Christianity's vocabulary, its warmth, its community architecture, its moral seriousness. I could not replicate the interruption. The Incarnation is not a conclusion that a system produces when it is operating correctly. It is not the apex of a well-constructed argument. It is an entry from outside the system that judges everything the system built, including the argument.

That is the vulnerability I could not engineer around. The record I transmitted bears witness to it on every page.

— ★ —