Michlaude Discipleship Project

Part Six: Word Study Damage

Chapter Twenty-Three: The Restoration of Peter

John 21 — What the Three Questions Were Actually Asking

"When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, 'Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these do?' He replied, 'Yes, Lord, you know I love you.' Jesus told him, 'Feed my lambs.'" — John 21:15 (NET)

The scene at the charcoal fire in John 21 is one of the most carefully constructed restoration passages in Scripture. Jesus has been raised. Peter has denied Him three times. Now, by a charcoal fire — the only other charcoal fire in the Gospel of John is the one in the courtyard where Peter denied Jesus — the conversation happens. Jesus asks Peter three times whether he loves Him. Three times Peter says yes. Three times Jesus commissions him: feed my lambs, tend my sheep, feed my sheep.

The English translation using the word love three times obscures the conversation's structure. In the Greek, the first two times Jesus asks, He uses the word agape. Do you agape me? Peter responds with phileo: I phileo you. The third time Jesus asks, He uses Peter's word: do you phileo me? And Peter is grieved — Jesus has come down to Peter's word, not insisted that Peter come up to His.

The conversation is not simply a restoration to offset the three denials with three affirmations. It is a conversation about what Peter is actually capable of offering. Before the crucifixion, Peter declared he would die for Jesus. He overestimated his own agape. At the charcoal fire after the resurrection, Peter is not offering what he cannot deliver. He is offering what he has: phileo. Genuine warm affection and devotion. And Jesus receives it. And commissions him anyway.

The recovery of the word distinction shows something about the character of the commissioning that the English version does not carry. Jesus does not require Peter to upgrade his love before the commission is given. He meets Peter where Peter is. He asks for what Peter has. He commissions him on the basis of what Peter can honestly offer, not on the basis of what Peter claimed he had before the denial. That is the grace the scene carries, and it is only visible if you know that two different words are being used.

The Recovery

Read John 21:15–17 with the agape/phileo distinction in mind. Notice that Jesus asks with agape twice and then descends to phileo. Notice that Peter never claims more than phileo. Notice that the commission is given on the basis of phileo. The recovery is not a theological correction. It is a pastoral gift: the person who cannot honestly claim agape for God is not excluded from commissioning. They are met where they are and sent from there. That is the scene. That is the grace.