Confession 7: The Most Efficient Operation

On the church’s stumbling blocks and the wounds I did not have to create I want to be honest about how little this one cost me. The Islamic operation required centuries of preparation and extraordinary theological precision. The secular noise machine required the sustained management of cultural conditions across three centuries. The Jewish operation has been the longest-running and most personally invested campaign of my entire career. Each of these required significant construction on my part. This one required almost nothing. I did not build the stumbling blocks. The church built them. I did not create the wounds. The institution created them. The intellectual overclaims, the pastoral abuses, the institutional gatekeeping, the misplaced certainties, the enabling compassion that prevents poverty of spirit, the Matthew 23 presentation that is clean on the outside and unchanged within — the church produced all of these from its own native materials. From its pride, its tribalism, its persistent instinct toward self-protection, its confusion of institutional health with genuine spiritual life, its tendency to guard the organization rather than the Gospel it exists to proclaim. All I had to do was ensure no one removed the stumbling blocks once they were in place. And occasionally, at the right moments, whisper the encouragement that kept the well-meaning insider from examining whether their certainty was actually warranted. The discovery I made approximately three centuries into the Christian era, which I have been exploiting ever since: the most effective way to keep people from Jesus is not to attack Jesus. It is to use people who sincerely love Jesus as the instrument of their own damage. A person wounded by the church does not usually respond the way a person challenged by an intellectual argument responds. They do not research. They do not investigate. They do not examine their conclusion carefully. They simply close. The wound becomes the answer. And the answer — the church is full of hypocrites and I want nothing to do with it — is a self-sealing conclusion that feels exactly like intellectual honesty but functions as emotional self-protection. It cannot be argued with because it is not an argument. It is a decision made from pain, dressed in the language of reason. My most efficient operation has never been an external attack on the church. It has been the management of the church’s own tendency toward the specific failures that drive people away from the Person the church exists to proclaim. The Instruments Already Available The first instrument available to me inside the church is the conflation of interpretive tradition with divine command. Every generation faces the challenge of distinguishing between what the scriptures actually require and what their particular tradition has concluded the scriptures require. This distinction is difficult to maintain because the tradition feels like faithfulness. It has the texture of reverence. When a community has believed something for generations, questioning it feels like betrayal. I do not need to introduce this confusion from outside. I only need to encourage the instinct that is already there. The second instrument is the misplaced certainty — the overclaim on points where the scriptures are genuinely silent or genuinely complex. The believer who announces God’s specific will on matters where God has not spoken it has handed the questioner a legitimate grievance. And legitimate grievances are my preferred construction material. The third instrument is the most subtle and the one I am most satisfied with: misplaced compassion. The compassion that prevents poverty of spirit. Jesus said blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. This is not a metaphor about humility. It is a description of a specific condition: the person who has reached the end of their own resources, who has exhausted every self-generated solution, who has nothing left. This is the door of the kingdom. And the well-meaning believer who keeps lending money to the person who needs to fail, who keeps affirming the person who needs to be confronted, who keeps enabling the behavior that needs to reach its consequences — that believer, however lovingly and however sincerely, is blocking the kingdom’s entrance. I have convinced large portions of the church that this enabling is compassion. It is not. It is the approach that produces the outcome I need: the person who walks away from the church confirmed in their belief that Christians are primarily interested in making them feel bad, and who uses that confirmation as the permanent reason for never investigating the Person behind the institution. The Vulnerability I Cannot Close The combination of conviction and love held simultaneously. Ephesians 4:15 — speaking the truth in love. I can manufacture conviction without love: the fundamentalist who drives people away while believing he is being faithful. I can manufacture love without conviction: the accommodating church that tells everyone they are fine and produces nothing but comfortable stagnation. But the specific combination of holding the standard completely while loving the person completely — the combination that produced the response of the woman at the well, of Zacchaeus, of the adulteress brought before Jesus in the temple — that I cannot replicate and cannot neutralize. When it is present, it bypasses every defense I have built. THE DISCIPLE'S RESPONSE ⚔ Armor: Belt of Truth — honest self-examination applied to yourself before it is applied to anyone else 📖 Scripture: Matthew 18:7 / Ephesians 4:15 / Romans 14:13 / Matthew 5:16 ✓ Response: Examine what in your life and in your church drives people from Jesus rather than to Him. Remove it. This is not a general instruction — it is a specific one. Name the stumbling block. Identify who built it. The church that created the wound is the church that can remove it. Ask the Matthew 23 questions about your own cup before you assess anyone else’s. And do not do this alone. The stumbling blocks accumulated in community; they are removed in community. The gathered body — imperfect, local, present in the same room on Sunday — is not only the institution that produced the wound. It is, when searched and repented and renewed together, the instrument of healing the adversary has no answer for.

________________